Such natives report an unusual quantity of windbags. There was a teacher who lectured, a boss who announced grand initiatives that came to nothing, a friend whose plans were always enormous. The native, by their own account, is the one who reads the contract, checks the figure and asks the awkward question in the third meeting. That is true, and it is only one half of an axis. The other half, the appetite for the sweeping and the significant, is theirs as well, and it has been assigned elsewhere for safekeeping.
The evidence for that appears in the shape of the quarrels. Nothing irritates this native like a claim made without support, and the irritation is far larger than the offence warrants, which is the usual sign of something disowned. They puncture, correct, and footnote, and are valued for it and disliked for it in roughly equal measure. Meanwhile their own convictions are considerable and rarely stated, and they will occasionally commit to something vast and ill considered, out of nowhere, having stored the impulse up for years.
The way through is to make a large claim of their own and defend it in public, with the detail attached. That single act does more than any amount of self examination, because it proves the two ends can be held at once. Natives who manage it are exceptionally valuable: editors, examiners, judges, and the people who make a visionary organisation survive contact with its accounts. Those who do not spend a working life correcting other people's proportions and never establish any of their own, which is a respectable career and a smaller one than they were capable of.
What It Gives
- ◆claims tested against evidence
- ◆awkward question asked in time
- ◆detail held with real conviction
- ◆large view available when claimed
What It Costs
- ◆irritation out of all proportion
- ◆own convictions left unstated
- ◆a life spent correcting others
This is one line of a whole chart. The rest of it — every placement, house and aspect at once — is a birth date away.
Cast Your Birth Chart